<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Effectively Completing the Attack (and this posting)&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2006/04/effectively-completing-the-attack-and-this-posting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2006/04/effectively-completing-the-attack-and-this-posting/</link>
	<description>A weblog dedicated to educating the community on security threats that matter</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: System Advancements at the Monastery &#187; Blog Archive &#187; From Cyber Space with Love</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2006/04/effectively-completing-the-attack-and-this-posting/#comment-123235</link>
		<dc:creator>System Advancements at the Monastery &#187; Blog Archive &#187; From Cyber Space with Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 02:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2006/04/effectively-completing-the-attack-and-this-posting/#comment-123235</guid>
		<description>[...] employ something akin to a BGP blackhole routing function that results in all packets destined to those three specific IPs, or the covering prefixes, being discarded as a result of null or discard next hop packet forwarding policies, as discussed here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] employ something akin to a BGP blackhole routing function that results in all packets destined to those three specific IPs, or the covering prefixes, being discarded as a result of null or discard next hop packet forwarding policies, as discussed here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny McPherson</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2006/04/effectively-completing-the-attack-and-this-posting/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny McPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 19:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2006/04/effectively-completing-the-attack-and-this-posting/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>As usual, good point Chris.  Though I'm not sure "No one cares", as usually someone cares - it's just that that someone doesn't matter (re: $) very much for whatever reason :-) 

Nonetheless, I'll see if there's a way to capture this observation in future cuts..  

Thanks for the comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, good point Chris.  Though I&#8217;m not sure &#8220;No one cares&#8221;, as usually someone cares - it&#8217;s just that that someone doesn&#8217;t matter (re: $) very much for whatever reason :-) </p>
<p>Nonetheless, I&#8217;ll see if there&#8217;s a way to capture this observation in future cuts..  </p>
<p>Thanks for the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Morrow</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2006/04/effectively-completing-the-attack-and-this-posting/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Morrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 02:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2006/04/effectively-completing-the-attack-and-this-posting/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>So, one thing to keep in mind here is that often, a vast majority of the time actually, the attacked host is not important to anyone involved. No one cares if shell-server-2's 33'rd vhost is 'offline'.

In cases where the destination ip address is 'important' obviously the 'complete the attack' solution is not implemented. Perhaps it's hard to encapsulate this sort of thing in the survey or results? 

Thanks for the results and survey though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, one thing to keep in mind here is that often, a vast majority of the time actually, the attacked host is not important to anyone involved. No one cares if shell-server-2&#8217;s 33&#8242;rd vhost is &#8216;offline&#8217;.</p>
<p>In cases where the destination ip address is &#8216;important&#8217; obviously the &#8216;complete the attack&#8217; solution is not implemented. Perhaps it&#8217;s hard to encapsulate this sort of thing in the survey or results? </p>
<p>Thanks for the results and survey though :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
