<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Church of Scientology DDoS Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/</link>
	<description>A weblog dedicated to educating the community on security threats that matter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:35:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: US-Gericht pro Scientology: Anonymous Aktivist Dmitriy Guzner verurteilt &#124; www.tutsi.de</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-238622</link>
		<dc:creator>US-Gericht pro Scientology: Anonymous Aktivist Dmitriy Guzner verurteilt &#124; www.tutsi.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/#comment-238622</guid>
		<description>[...] wenn eventuell illegale Aktionen innerhalb des Netzwerks von Anonymous nicht unumstritten sind, halten auch wir nach wie vor einen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wenn eventuell illegale Aktionen innerhalb des Netzwerks von Anonymous nicht unumstritten sind, halten auch wir nach wie vor einen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atheists&#8217; MySpace page restored after hacking incident &#171; Cyber Crimes</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-173298</link>
		<dc:creator>Atheists&#8217; MySpace page restored after hacking incident &#171; Cyber Crimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/#comment-173298</guid>
		<description>[...] Nazario, senior security and software engineer at Arbor Networks, said last month on his blog that researchers had detected nearly 500 DDoS attacks against the church, with an average size of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nazario, senior security and software engineer at Arbor Networks, said last month on his blog that researchers had detected nearly 500 DDoS attacks against the church, with an average size of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDoS&#8217;ing CNN.com Will Not Promote Your Country</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-104708</link>
		<dc:creator>DDoS&#8217;ing CNN.com Will Not Promote Your Country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/#comment-104708</guid>
		<description>[...] After numerous targeted attacks from the group known as Anonymous against the Scientology Web site, Arbor Networks was able to mitigate those DDoS attacks. According to Web surfers, CNN is not worse than Scientology, so Arbor Networks earns some street [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After numerous targeted attacks from the group known as Anonymous against the Scientology Web site, Arbor Networks was able to mitigate those DDoS attacks. According to Web surfers, CNN is not worse than Scientology, so Arbor Networks earns some street [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scientology Church aangepakt met DDoS-aanvallen</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-61941</link>
		<dc:creator>Scientology Church aangepakt met DDoS-aanvallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/#comment-61941</guid>
		<description>[...] aanvallen &#8220;De aanvallen zijn duidelijk echt&#8221;, schrijft Nazario op de blog van Arbor Networks. Volgens hem gaat het om doorsnee DDoS-aanvallen, en heeft de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aanvallen &#8220;De aanvallen zijn duidelijk echt&#8221;, schrijft Nazario op de blog van Arbor Networks. Volgens hem gaat het om doorsnee DDoS-aanvallen, en heeft de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-61895</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 05:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/#comment-61895</guid>
		<description>I think that one guy meant &quot;extent&quot;.  It&#039;s kind of lame (botnets).  You don&#039;t really have the firepower or knowledge to bring down CoS... I&#039;m no fan of CoS but you may as well give it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that one guy meant &#8220;extent&#8221;.  It&#8217;s kind of lame (botnets).  You don&#8217;t really have the firepower or knowledge to bring down CoS&#8230; I&#8217;m no fan of CoS but you may as well give it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stud</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-61767</link>
		<dc:creator>Stud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/#comment-61767</guid>
		<description>Be careful with this religion.  They are brainwashed to believe that they truly are the on true hope for mankind.  So they stand so firm and attack back.  
I would install the botnet if it meant to be used for this purpose.  I hate when you cannot use freedom of speech and someone tries to stop it.  They should not be let to do what they did.  Next thing you know they will try to get some law passed that lets them (SCN) do what they want because they are a religion.

Well done Anonymous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful with this religion.  They are brainwashed to believe that they truly are the on true hope for mankind.  So they stand so firm and attack back.<br />
I would install the botnet if it meant to be used for this purpose.  I hate when you cannot use freedom of speech and someone tries to stop it.  They should not be let to do what they did.  Next thing you know they will try to get some law passed that lets them (SCN) do what they want because they are a religion.</p>
<p>Well done Anonymous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-botter</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-61765</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-botter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/#comment-61765</guid>
		<description>haha at the &#039;anonymous&#039; people
for all your hyping up, the actual attacks themselves were pathetic and barely kept the sites down, any single person with an average botnet could have done a better job. sorry but you&#039;re not as big as you think you are in this game</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha at the &#8216;anonymous&#8217; people<br />
for all your hyping up, the actual attacks themselves were pathetic and barely kept the sites down, any single person with an average botnet could have done a better job. sorry but you&#8217;re not as big as you think you are in this game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Versus the Church of Scientology</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-61754</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Versus the Church of Scientology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/#comment-61754</guid>
		<description>[...] The attack statistics, according to Jose Nazario at Arbor Networks here: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The attack statistics, according to Jose Nazario at Arbor Networks here: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-61213</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/#comment-61213</guid>
		<description>you just noted the tip of the iceberg, this is just 1 website out of many</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you just noted the tip of the iceberg, this is just 1 website out of many</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-61040</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/01/church-of-scientology-ddos-statistics/#comment-61040</guid>
		<description>Totally wrong.  You should look into your numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally wrong.  You should look into your numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
