<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biggest Botnet: Technical Details on Hexzone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2009/04/biggest-botnet-technical-details-on-hexzone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2009/04/biggest-botnet-technical-details-on-hexzone/</link>
	<description>A weblog dedicated to educating the community on security threats that matter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:00:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blah</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2009/04/biggest-botnet-technical-details-on-hexzone/comment-page-1/#comment-206946</link>
		<dc:creator>blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/?p=914#comment-206946</guid>
		<description>Why give these things cool names? Microsoft always refers to attackers in the feminine and you should do the same. So this would be something like... &quot;douchebag net&quot;.

Also, not good of Finjan to keep this to themselves so they&#039;d have something to present at RSA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why give these things cool names? Microsoft always refers to attackers in the feminine and you should do the same. So this would be something like&#8230; &#8220;douchebag net&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, not good of Finjan to keep this to themselves so they&#8217;d have something to present at RSA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunter Ollmann</title>
		<link>http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2009/04/biggest-botnet-technical-details-on-hexzone/comment-page-1/#comment-206562</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunter Ollmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asert.arbornetworks.com/?p=914#comment-206562</guid>
		<description>One problem with this &quot;Biggest Botnet&quot; is that, apart from some totals within an HTML-based Web portal, I&#039;m missing any real sizing information. Any botnets I know that approximate that kind of size are well known and well covered... which is why I have doubts about the sizing.

I blogged about the sizing aspect of the botnet and why I wouldn&#039;t necessarily trust a Web portal figure earlier this week -- &quot;Caution over counting numbers in CnC Portals&quot; -- http://blog.damballa.com/?p=157</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One problem with this &#8220;Biggest Botnet&#8221; is that, apart from some totals within an HTML-based Web portal, I&#8217;m missing any real sizing information. Any botnets I know that approximate that kind of size are well known and well covered&#8230; which is why I have doubts about the sizing.</p>
<p>I blogged about the sizing aspect of the botnet and why I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily trust a Web portal figure earlier this week &#8212; &#8220;Caution over counting numbers in CnC Portals&#8221; &#8212; <a href="http://blog.damballa.com/?p=157" rel="nofollow">http://blog.damballa.com/?p=157</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
